Mighty Belief Revision

نویسندگان

چکیده

Abstract Belief revision theories standardly endorse a principle of intensionality to the effect that ideal doxastic agents do not discriminate between pieces information are equivalent within classical logic. I argue this should be rejected. Its failure, on my view, does require failures logical omniscience part agent, but results from view update as mighty : encoding what agent learns might case, well must be. The is motivated by consideration puzzle obtained transposing into context belief kind scenario Kit Fine has used against intensionalism about counterfactuals. Employing framework truthmaker semantics, go develop novel account revision, based conception mighty, which validates natural hyperintensional counterparts usual AGM postulates.

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Belief Revision

Philippa, a Greek nineteen year old student at Patras University, has just discovered that Nikos and Angela are not her true parents; she was adopted when she was six months old from an orphanage in Sao Paulo. The news really shook Philippa. Much of what she used to believe all her life about herself and her family was wrong. After recovering from the initial shock she started putting her thoug...

متن کامل

Revocable Belief Revision

Krister Segerberg proposed irrevocable belief revision, to be contrasted with standard belief revision, in a setting wherein belief of propositional formulas is modelled explicitly. This suggests that in standard belief revision is revocable: one should be able to unmake (‘revoke’) the fresh belief in the revision formula, given yet further information that contradicts it. In a dynamic epistemi...

متن کامل

Trust-Sensitive Belief Revision

Belief revision is concerned with incorporating new information into a pre-existing set of beliefs. When the new information comes from another agent, we must first determine if that agent should be trusted. In this paper, we define trust as a pre-processing step before revision. We emphasize that trust in an agent is often restricted to a particular domain of expertise. We demonstrate that thi...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Journal of Philosophical Logic

سال: 2022

ISSN: ['1573-0433', '0022-3611']

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10992-022-09663-7